Hey all! It turns out that anyone can vote for Rochester Reads -- so if you're so inclined to give Candyfreak your vote, check out the link below. (This will all make sense once you read...)
* * *
I have a confession. I've never participated in Rochester Reads. Haven't voted. Haven't read the books. Haven't sat in on any of the discussions.
You'd think I'd have done this, right? I'm a reader. Heck, I'm a writer. This is my kind of thing.
Plus, if the program's title is to be believed, Rochester Reads. So it's my duty — as it is yours — to get in on this. I already think of us Rochesterites as one big family (with the occasional cranky grandpa and a few weird cousins thrown in), and I love the idea of all of us curling up with the same book.
For those of you who are new to the program, here's a quick 411 on how it works: Each year, the Rochester Reads committee pulls together a list of prospective books — some nominated by the committee, some nominated by community members. You and I are then invited to vote for our favorites. We get to pick one main title, one young adult title and one children's title from the bunch. When the winning book in each category is announced, we all read it and attend related events. Last year, 7,000 people participated in Rochester Reads events, which included author visits, films, discussions and other programs.
Seriously. We are like the coolest city.
I'd already decided this was my year to get with the program — and then I found out that Steve Almond's book, Candyfreak, was one of the books up for the honor.
For possibly the first time in my life, I actually said the words, "Hot damn!"
There are a number of reasons I'd like to see Candyfreak win the Rochester Reads honor. One is because, simply, I love this book. It's the story of Almond's freakish obsession with candy (with which I can totally relate) mixed with a tour of independent candy companies who are struggling to survive in a world of conglomerates.
Like my other favorite contemporary writers (Dave Eggers, David Sedaris), Almond's writing is funny and real. Plus, he's a fantastic public reader. I've had the opportunity to hear him read twice, including once last fall when he came through Minneapolis on a book tour. ("He makes you laugh and think and feel all at once," gushed a friend at the time.) Almond also happens to have led a writing workshop I attended last summer – and, frankly, it would just be cool to see him again.
But mostly I'd like to see Candyfreak make the cut because it has all the elements I look for in a good book: It's hysterical and conversational. It's thought-provoking and entertaining.
To show you I'm not alone in my adoration, I shot my friend Jen an e-mail and asked her to share her Candyfreak opinions for this column. It turns out Jen should be a book reviewer.
"Someone said Candyfreak was like a Whitman sampler, but it's not really," she wrote. "Whitman samplers, for all their variety, are still a bit formulaic and boring: waxy, grainy, a waste of calories. If you have to assign Candyfreak a metaphor, make it artisan chocolate — the kind you can't get just anywhere. The hand-crafted stuff that's pure quality and a personality all its own. Almond's book is that handmade stuff that's so unique you'll want to savor it but it's so good you end up just stuffing the whole thing in your mouth and feeling sick and happy.
And, really, I can't top that synopsis so I'm not even going to try.
Whether your vote is for Candyfreak or one of the other worthy Rochester Reads books, I invite you to join me in jumping on the Rochester Reads bandwagon this year. Voting began June 1 and continues until the end of the month. Visit the Rochester Reads Web site at www.rochesterreads.org or stop in at the library, the Post-Bulletin or the Apache Mall Barnes & Noble to cast your ballot.